Archive for November, 2011

Nancy Janes stealing supporters – in action!

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

After misleading Sara Lima – a ROLDA supporter – to believe the trash from the website created to destroy the Romanian charity, what do you think Nancy Janes did?

 

After getting the feeling that Sara Lima will not support ROLDA anymore (and she is not the only one convinced abjectly to stop helping ultimately some dogs in need) Nancy Janes immediately “attacked” her with this proposal:

 saralima

This is going on for years, RAR and Nancy Janes has no professional capability to get new supporters, therefore she is slandering ROLDA and “lie in wait” for the new “victims” to be attacked for donations …

How Nancy Janes & Co. takes credit for other charities work

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

Easier than working is talking. And much more convenient. At least this is what Nancy Janes thinks lately as beside the 10-20 sterilizations that her charity done in different (not ever in a single place) to “solve” Romanian animals problem, she and her charity have “pending” or “postponed” or “handed over to others” projects!

 

RAA work is nule in Romania. Why “nule” – because they don’t do anything at all since May 2011 when stop “rehoming” dogs from ROLDA ;-) So no comment about them at this point.

 

Nancy Janes and her gang misinform the public opinion, pretending that the changes done at the large ROLDA shelter, thanks to the local sponsor AMG are “their” achievement. Beside the ineptitude of these statements (because RAR was never able, despite making few attempts, to build any type of shelter for Romanian animals to “teach us” how to do our work!) there are few things that public opinion must be aware of.

 

Firstly, the AMG was convinced by ROLDA (and they approved the extra grant for shelter rebuilding) from January 2011. The budget of large corporations are done in time, so it’s ridiculous and offensive to affirm that because “RAR and RAA Facebook page” or Anja Stein ridiculous emails something was done.

 

Dana Costin explained to the volunteers coming over at premises that improvements are about to happen, the fact it took months is internal decision of AMG, who needed approval for this grant for corporation, than an auction was organized to choose the company that works to rebuilding and construction, etc.

 

ROLDA is happy that despite delays these changes took places and protest against the impudence that RAR and RAA has to take credits for ROLDA persuasive attitude to fight for dogs welfare, for ROLDA hard work done daily in Romania.

 

Please people protest against this revolting method that RAR and RAA has to influence the few people that still care for Romanian dogs, implying that everything good happens because they exist; it is outrageous – they should start working and stop begging people attention, pretending with hypocrisy what miracles they do to change Romania and dogs reality!

 

Another abusive remark is the fact Nancy Janes pretends that the shelter is not open to the public. Than how Siri, Anja and others took photos inside the shelter, if these are not open for everyone?

 

The change of medicines cocktail for emotional disorders that Nancy Janes takes from years like lolli-pops apparently is causing side-effects. It is impossible for a normal person, with functioning brain and even limited intelligence to continue to harass people from ROLDA since 2006 and get away unpunished!

Boycott RAR and RAA

Friday, November 18th, 2011

These two charities have spreaded lies and nasty rumors against ROLDA for months, directly or via different persons (or fake names) on internet, especially on Facebook where ROLDA has a presence and its supporters are visible.

Among the lies they induced people to believe:

 ROLDA has a dogs pension (boarding kennels) and not a shelter.

Apparently in all the volunteers’ testimonials (writen in the past years) that  the complotters use on the website they created against ROLDA – noone mention a pension. Everyone coming to ROLDA speaks about two shelters.

ROLDA is not a registered charity 

After the registration certificate has been posted online, they move on – not even apologiaze for lying the public with the most evil intentions!

Dana Costin has luxury cars

Documents  showed Dana Costin has NO CAR .

The vice-president of HSUS spoke against ROLDA

Confronted, the HSUS vice-president denied and Nancy Janes looked again like a fool.

The Dogs Trust team consider ROLDA a scam

A recorded proof can show the Dogs Trust representative real opinion on the circus created around ROLDA name.

ROLDA is investigated for fraud

Dana Costin or ROLDA have never , not even once, being asked by any Romanian or foreign institution about anything related to the recent rumors circulating on the internet.

Apart from putting ROLDA in bad light fraudulently and to stop the funds coming to help the dogs, nothing was accomplished. Does RAR and RAA do a better job as a result of their slander campaign?

Now, when it turned out to be a waste from RAR and RAA side and a loss from many points of view from ROLDA side…what are we going to do against the creators of these abuses against ROLDA?

How we all should react against Nancy Janes. Kendra Pinder, Chrissy Phillips and their puppets like Brenda, Kat, Alex I., etc…?

It is not only a matter of justice for ROLDA, but also it is meant to prevent these women’ actions in future, against other Romanian charities they might not like at one point or another.

WHO TELLS ROMANIANS WHAT AND HOW TO CARE FOR DOGS?

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

NANCY JANES

After lighted the fire, causing and being the main responsible for the campaign of abuses and harassment against ROLDA, Nancy Janes appeared like a virgin to give advices ;-)

Same cheap drama. Same stupid actress.

She pose in the dogs expert advising people who run a shelter for years what they should and what they shouldn’t do.

Read this atrocious real story that she recently posted on Romania Animal Rescue cause on Facebook, about a dog adopted by her!

Nancy Janes took this dog as a puppy from Romania. Put in Janes’ dogs pack he was abused by her other adult dogs. This poor puppy grew up like this,  frightened, and one day he was almost killed by Janes dogs in fight.

How do you think that Nancy Janes (now a real advisor on “what-other-romanian-shelters-must-do”) reacted to this horrible situation that she created only by herself, thanks to her “great dogs experience”? Well, she try to get rid of the problem by passing the dog to SPCA San Francisco. Unfortunately, despite this people experience and willingness, the dog was too screwed up to be rehabilitated and was sent back to Janes.

When the dog was again back to “his mommy” she post on her Facebook page a pledge for someone to take the dog and save her from another very stupid thing that would add up to the mountain of personal failures.

Nickster

Ask  Nancy Janes what happened with the puppy she “raised with toys and advices”….and where he is now….if so concerned about the animals.

Funny is that Nancy Janes “raised funds” for a shelter in Buzau that she never built…she “handed” the project idea to a former partner (not also the moneyshe raised)….Isn’t it great when you pretend to raise money for something and than pass the hard work on others?!

Or it might be the “american style” (her own words!)  of helping the Romanian dogs?! Of course not all Americans have this style…as only few also complete fake financial papers for IRS!

Shocking proofs about a new slandering

Sunday, November 13th, 2011

 

ANJA STEIN, THE NANCY JANES “TOOL”

Whom would have thought that a “noble” volunteer like Anja Stein, morally preoccupied about dogs (especially ROLDA dogs) would lie publically imprudently?!

On a recent page created on Facebook to compromise ROLDA work, Anja Stein declared that:

” The Large Shelter is completely paid by ArcelorMittal (we asked AM 4 (!) times via e-mails and letters for details about their deal with ROLDA – no respond. We asked because we want to be really sure in what we put on our website).”

anja_stein_FB

Now let’s see whom is the real big time liar!

Please read this piece of document! 

anja _faxIt was sent by Anja Stein by fax to ROLDA major sponsor. Here, she pretends to be in contact with a journalist and make an inquiry about a possible documentary about ROLDA and the steel plant investment.

Can you see how mean and duplicitar people like Anja Stein are? This is a clear example of the tormenting time that people from ROLDA have because of Nancy Janes who initiated this slander campaign, Kendra Pinder, Chrissy Phillips and Co.

The main target of Anja Stein was to gather information, she got no reply from the ROLDA sponsor; than her next message was to accuses ROLDA for being a fraud…So one letter  is about a journalist who want to make a documentary and the second letter (after not getting what she wanted) was slandering ROLDA to its best sponsor. To accomplish what?!

Let the dogs starve?! Redirect donations to RAR and RAA ?! Simply hurt a hard work?!

Another question arise : How the clever Anja Stein came up with the amount of 150000 EUR/year?! Going on like this, she can easily say tomorrow 300000 EUR or a million….and what we do : believe her?

Is she a financial expert? Did she saw ROLDA financial balance? Apart from the steel plant which covers 90%+ of the entire budget,there are  private donations coming from supporters which were mainly used for renovation work….nothing even close to the amounts Stein is writing about.

And if you would ask Nancy Janes directly you’ll sink even more in details, as she would say that ROLDA has 500000 USD in donations.

UK group against ROLDA

While creating a new Facebook page to “claim their sincere concern” for the ROLDA dogs, they can’t stop themselves LYING!

They tendentiously mislead supporters that ROLDA shelter doesn’t have dog beds. Photos posted by ROLDA team on Facebook immediately proof  dogs have beds and straws.

They abusively imply that dogs are dying at the shelter – of course showing no proofs because there are none.

The “admin” of the Facebook page remove comments posted by ROLDA supporters , which defended this great charity; claiming  to be “concerned” for dogs on the photos. But when the team of puppets slander ROLDA with all sorts of accusations – they don’t remove those comments because the main reason for this page to be created is to HURT ROLDA.

Another example on how to mislead people.  Someone wrote in Romanian language:

pageFB1

You can easily translate with Google Translator.

How it was translated to fool people?

pageFB2

It never stops amazing me how these people manipulates to hurt ROLDA dogs!

NANCY JANES

After lighted the fire, causing and being the main responsible for the campaign of abuses and harassment against ROLDA, Nancy Janes appeared like a virgin to give advices ;-)

Same cheap drama. Same stupid actress.

She pose in the dogs expert advising people who run a shelter for years what they should and what they shouldn’t do.

Read this atrocious real story that she recently posted on Romania Animal Rescue cause on Facebook, about a dog adopted by her!

Nancy Janes took this dog as a puppy from Romania. Put in Janes’ dogs pack he was abused by her other adult dogs. This poor puppy grew up like this,  frightened, and one day he was almost killed by Janes dogs in fight.

How do you think that Nancy Janes (now a real advisor on “what-other-romanian-shelters-must-do”) reacted to this horrible situation that she created only by herself, thanks to her “great dogs experience”? Well, she try to get rid of the problem by passing the dog to SPCA San Francisco. Unfortunately, despite this people experience and willingness, the dog was too screwed up to be rehabilitated and was sent back to Janes.

When the dog was again back to “his mommy” she post on her Facebook page a pledge for someone to take the dog and save her from another very stupid thing that would add up to the mountain of personal failures.

Ask Janes what happened with the puppy she “raised with toys and advices”….and where he is now….if so concerned about the animals.

Funny is that Nancy Janes “raised funds” for a shelter in Buzau that she never built…she “handed” the project idea to a former partner (not also the moneyshe raised)….Isn’t it great when you pretend to raise money for something and than pass the hard work on others?!

Or it might be the “american style” (her own words!)  of helping the Romanian dogs?! Of course not all Americans have this style…as only few also complete fake financial papers for IRS!

In the end, regarding the Facebook page:

ROLDA said that the dogs from the Facebook page, Hula, Aura, Kiki and Co. are either adopted in different countries or still at the small and large shelter waiting a forever home.

Of course this is no explanation to this Facebook page admin, a nullity for Romanian animals …..this is just an explanation in case someone really want to give a chance to those dogs.

Now let’s see if their Facebook page disappear or it will be spotted as a good place to throw more garbage in those who actively do work in Romania!

Another lie coming from Romania Animal Aid, UK

Sunday, November 6th, 2011

Permanent target : ROLDA

Reason: UNKNOWN (well, some of us do know)

New lie: legal action taken by RAA against ROLDA

This is actually a ”more lies in one” because:

- ROLDA didn’t received any kind of official letter (except online gargabes posted on Facebook, etc) ;

(To be completely honest, ROLDA didn’t received ANY official complaint from no authority in Romania or elsewhere. ROLDA or its President, Dana Costin were never investigated or accussed , not to mention convicted in Romania or abroad.

The garbage circulating is created by sick minds to hurt ROLDA image in order to redirect the possible support(e.g. donations) to RAA and RAR instead.)

- It is funny that RAA first accussed ROLDA to steal from them 6000 GBP (or EUR, they were unsure about currency) but they didn’t took legal action for this….they preffered to suggest a connection of ROLDA to this website…and use resources for legal battle…..this is a trap to fool more naives!

WAKE UP, ANIMAL LOVERS!

Reflection

Sunday, November 6th, 2011

I wonder why some Romanians make more fool of themselves by giving a new purpose to their lives to kiss foreign people posteriors?!

Proofs against Nancy Janes & Co. lies

Saturday, November 5th, 2011

A letter writen by Cenac to Nancy Janes in favour of ROLDA and Dana Costin

Nancy Janes represents Romania Animal Rescue (RAR). Since ROLDA split RAR, one of Nancy Janes’ goals became to slander this charity as much and as often as possible.

Because she knows that ROLDA doesn’t have resources to sue her in California,  her obsession is limitless and getting worse, despite the regular medication that Janes take to control her damaged brain/ emotions.

Same goes to Kendra Pinder, a very “respected” forgery from UK, used to be a medium and than a defender of abused kids….now an “eternal” animal lover…

These ”characters” (Kendra Pinder and Nancy Janes plus the gang they are paying to slander ROLDA using different online tools) spread Cenac video on the internet - commenting abusively that Cenac dogs became sick because some pups abandoned by ROLDA and Dana.

This proof posted here will show among other conclusions you can jump using your own head, that:

1. Cenac has a duplicity personality and is basically a big liar;

2. Nancy Janes, Kendra Pinder and Co. know, in fact ,that no dog or puppy got sick  by ROLDA 5 years ago(!!!) in the municipal pound where Cenac is employed (where there are numerous dogs with distemper let free to get sick the healthy ones).

Why these women poisoned people heart and hurted ROLDA? Beside greed and envy, what other justifications exist?

Photocopy of the letter hand-written by Cenac in 2007 addressed to Nancy Janes

cenac_letter 

Same time when Cenac agreed to lie in front of the camera to please the precarious intelligence of Nancy Janes, the same Cenac wrote this letter cheating (once again) ROLDA trust, in order to get advantages.

Letter is available in original for expertise, etc.

Basically Cenac declares (after he recorded the famous video where he lies with no conscience) that Dana from ROLDA helps his shelter regularly. Cenac admits that there is less support lately coming to his way from ROLDA, due to the lack of donations (note: created by Nancy Janes/ RAR continuous slander).

I quote :” This (note: the less financial support) doesn’t mean that Dana loves less than before the dogs for which she works tireless in the past two years”. 

I spoke with Dr. Gheorghita (note:  RAR vet) and I claimed that Dana doesn’t come same often in my shelter because I wanted to avoid for instance telling Gheorghita that no later than 2 days ago, Dana came to pick up a hurted dog to transport him to a different veterinary.

I was afraid that I might cause another problem in Dana’s relation with Gheorghita (note: who is very revengeful person).This ultimately would affect this shelter too (…) without Dana’s help – I don’t know honestly what it would happen with this shelter, Dana being the only person that truly understand the dogs needs and why some repairing work must be done for winter, etc….

Now, it is  my turn to ask you – readers :

Why do you think a person will have so many hidden faces?

Why Cenac recorded the film for Nancy Janes and in the same time, he would wrote such a letter saying nice things about Dana?

Why Nancy Janes didn’t put online this material, too?

Why, after 5 years + someone like Janes suddenly remember to make a big fuss about an incident she invented a while ago?! Maybe because she believe that the evidences will be lost and she will win something from manipulating people?!

WAKE UP! STOP LETTING YOURSELF BE FOOLED! IT IS RIDICULOUS, BECAUSE ANIMALS ARE SUFFERING! PLUS THE JUSTICE WILL ALWAYS BE ON THE SIDE OF HONEST CHARACTERS!

The so-called “threatening” phone call

Saturday, November 5th, 2011

“Threatened for revealing the truth….” what a cheap drama to fool more naives!!!! WEAK UP, people!

I am stunned that now Nancy Janes pretended she was “threaten” only because someone called at her home phone and said her she will be sued.

The whole drama is made to look like someone threaten to hurt her or something; this “incident” is amplified to fool more people with her obscure intentions of looking like a poor victim.

Nancy Janes started the whole slander campaign against ROLDA, she is not a victim – she is the author of all the garbage written lately, lies that hurt people and animals they look after.

Now, what she would expect?! People have intention to sue her, but if she would really feel “threaten” – it’s easy to solve this problem (if it would be true and not artificially created to get more sympathy) : call the Police, ask for the number and the place from where they /he called to be investigated….

Why mourning on the internet, and not take right decision?! To fool more people to give RAR a penny? Or send flowers to Janes?!